JH
Jonathan Haber

Model fallibility as the leader

Openly acknowledge your own uncertainty and mistakes before expecting others to do the same.

Key takeaways

  • What it is: Openly acknowledge your own uncertainty and mistakes before expecting others to do the same.
  • Why it works: Psychological safety is a shared belief, and beliefs about what is safe in a group are formed primarily from observing what happens to others — especially those with higher status. When a leader visibly admits uncertainty or error without suffering punishment, it calibrates the group’s sense of the cost of candor. Silence or defensiveness from leadership, conversely, signals that the penalty for candor is real.
  • Evidence: Backed by observational / correlational evidence.
  • Avoid: Saying "I don’t have all the answers" as a rhetorical move while visibly discomforting anyone who challenges your actual views — which teaches the opposite lesson.

Why it works

Psychological safety is a shared belief, and beliefs about what is safe in a group are formed primarily from observing what happens to others — especially those with higher status. When a leader visibly admits uncertainty or error without suffering punishment, it calibrates the group’s sense of the cost of candor. Silence or defensiveness from leadership, conversely, signals that the penalty for candor is real.

How to do it

  1. 1Name your own uncertainty out loud when you genuinely have it: "I don’t know — what do you think?"
  2. 2When you make a mistake, acknowledge it specifically and describe what you’re doing differently.
  3. 3Ask for input on decisions you have already formed — not as a formality, but ready to update.
  4. 4In meetings, share your tentative thinking early so others can push back before positions harden.

What the evidence says

Observational

Leader behavior is consistently identified as the primary driver of psychological safety in Edmondson’s research and subsequent organizational studies. Modeling fallibility reduces status-based inhibition to speaking up.

Honest caveat: Most evidence is observational; causal direction (safety leads to performance vs. performing teams feel safer) is debated. The leader-behavior link is correlational but consistent.

References
  • — Edmondson (1999), "Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams," Administrative Science Quarterly

Common mistake

Saying "I don’t have all the answers" as a rhetorical move while visibly discomforting anyone who challenges your actual views — which teaches the opposite lesson.

IX Coach helps you practice self-disclosure and uncertainty framing — the micro-moments of modeling that accumulate into a team’s safety belief.

Practice this with IX Coach →

Related practices