JH
Jonathan Haber

Assess readiness task by task, not person by person

Rate competence and commitment for the specific task in front of them, not the person overall.

Key takeaways

  • What it is: Rate competence and commitment for the specific task in front of them, not the person overall.
  • Why it works: The same person can be highly capable at one task and a novice at another, so a fixed judgment of "strong" or "weak" misleads. Assessing readiness — ability plus willingness — per task lets you calibrate support to the real gap instead of a stereotype, which is the part of the model with the most face validity.
  • Evidence: Plausible mechanism, limited direct outcome data.
  • Avoid: Labeling a person globally ("they’re a self-starter") and then under- or over-supporting them on a task that doesn’t match that label.

Why it works

The same person can be highly capable at one task and a novice at another, so a fixed judgment of "strong" or "weak" misleads. Assessing readiness — ability plus willingness — per task lets you calibrate support to the real gap instead of a stereotype, which is the part of the model with the most face validity.

How to do it

  1. 1For the task at hand, rate the person’s competence (skill/experience) and commitment (confidence/motivation).
  2. 2Notice that the same person may land differently across two different tasks.
  3. 3Re-assess as they gain experience — readiness is a moving target.

What the evidence says

Mechanistic

The general principle that capability is task-specific is well established in skill and expertise research. The model’s specific four-level "readiness" taxonomy, however, is a practitioner construct without strong psychometric validation.

Honest caveat: Task-specific skill is real; the discrete four-stage readiness scale is a heuristic, not a validated measurement instrument.

References
  • — Hersey & Blanchard, Management of Organizational Behavior (readiness/development levels)

Common mistake

Labeling a person globally ("they’re a self-starter") and then under- or over-supporting them on a task that doesn’t match that label.

IX Coach helps you reason through a specific delegation by separating "can they do this task" from "are they confident on it," instead of a blanket judgment.

Practice this with IX Coach →

Related practices