How does "Practise including the other person in your self-concept" work?

Aron’s model holds that closeness is operationally defined as the degree to which a person incorporates the other into their self-concept — borrows their perspectives, skills, and identity. This is not metaphor: research using reaction-time paradigms shows people are slower to distinguish self from close-other attributes the closer the relationship. Practices that deliberately invoke the other’s perspective strengthen this inclusion and deepen the experience of closeness.

How does "Pursue personal growth that you share — not parallel but joint" work?

Individual growth pursued privately does not activate the self-expansion-via-other mechanism. When growth is shared — each person expands, and the expansion is visible and reciprocally incorporated — the relationship itself becomes a vehicle for the most fundamental human motivation the model identifies. The vehicle effect makes the relationship feel alive and central rather than a comfortable backdrop to individual achievement.

How does "Audit current relationships for expansion rate" work?

If self-expansion is a motivation, its absence will be experienced as malaise or a diffuse sense of stagnation without an obvious cause. Periodic audit — asking "what new perspective, capability, or experience has this relationship brought me in the past three months?" — surfaces expansion rate as a trackable variable. Low rate is not evidence of failure but a signal to redesign how the relationship is spent.

How does "Use structured escalating self-disclosure to accelerate closeness" work?

Aron’s "36 questions" research demonstrated that sustained, reciprocal self-disclosure — starting with easy topics and gradually deepening — reliably generates closeness in pairs of strangers. The mechanism is mutual vulnerability and reciprocal self-expansion: each disclosure offers the other person new material to incorporate into their self-concept, and the progressiveness ensures comfort at each depth level before descending further.

How does "Protect expansion by resisting the slide into pure comfort" work?

Habituation reduces the subjective salience of familiar stimuli; in relationships, this means the expansion that once happened naturally — because everything was new — must now be deliberately engineered because the partner is deeply known. The motivation does not disappear; the natural supply of novelty does. Relationships that remain satisfying long-term are those where the partners actively introduce new shared experiences rather than relying on the natural flow of events.

How does "Apply the self-expansion framework to individual growth, not only relationships" work?

The self-expansion model does not require a partner; it proposes a general human motivation to expand. Individual pursuit of genuinely new skills, domains, or perspectives activates the same expansion mechanism. The motivational quality of "flow" and "meaning" in solo contexts is consistent with expansion: engaged novelty and challenge produce the felt sense of growing that the model identifies as intrinsically rewarding.

Arthur Aron — Self-Expansion

Why do close relationships feel exciting at first and how do you sustain that over time?

Evidence-based practices for sustaining closeness and personal growth through the self-expansion mechanism

Short answer

Arthur Aron’s self-expansion model proposes that people are motivated to grow — to expand their sense of self by incorporating new perspectives, skills, and resources — and that relationships are so motivating early on because they represent rapid self-expansion. The well-studied practical implication is that doing novel, challenging activities with a partner or close friend restores the expansion experience and revitalises closeness. The model has a substantial empirical base, primarily in romantic relationships.

Arthur Aron and colleagues proposed that humans have a fundamental motivation to expand the self — to grow more capable, knowledgeable, and connected. Relationships are initially exhilarating because they are the fastest route to self-expansion: a new person brings perspectives, experiences, and capabilities you did not have. When the novelty ends, expansion stalls — and the relationship can feel stagnant not because affection decreased but because growth stopped. The practices below are grounded in Aron’s published research programme, with honest notes on what the evidence directly supports.

The practices (7)

Why it works

When two people do something novel and moderately challenging together, they both expand — acquiring new capabilities and perspectives. The brain associates this expansion experience with the partner who was present, restoring the early-relationship "glow" that came from rapid natural expansion. The key variables are novelty and mild challenge: familiar, easy activities do not produce the same effect even if enjoyable.

How to do it

1Identify activities that are new to both partners (or new to one and taught by the other).
2Choose something with mild challenge — not terrifying, but requiring some effort and focus.
3Schedule a specific date and time; "we should do something new" rarely happens without scheduling.
4After the activity, spend a few minutes discussing what was new or surprising about the experience.

Evidence

RCT / meta-analysis

A key series of experiments found that couples who engaged in novel, arousing activities together reported greater relationship satisfaction compared to couples who engaged in pleasant but familiar activities, with the effect attributed to the self-expansion mechanism.

Honest caveat: Studies have primarily used short-term experiments with couples; the long-term sustainability and mechanisms across different relationship types are less studied.

— Aron, Norman, Aron, McKenna & Heyman (2000), "Couples’s shared participation in novel and arousing activities and experienced relationship quality", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Common mistake: Choosing activities that are novel to only one partner (a favourite hobby one person shares), which produces expansion for the learner but not for the teacher, and can create an asymmetry.

Go deeper on this practice →

Practice this with IX Coach

Reading about a practice changes nothing on its own. IX Coach turns these into a guided, adaptive routine — discerning where you are in real time and walking the practice with you, session after session.

Start with IX Coach →