JH
Jonathan Haber
Getting to Yes (Roger Fisher & William Ury)

What is principled negotiation from Getting to Yes, and how do you use it?

The Harvard method — negotiate on interests, not positions, and know your BATNA

Short answer

Getting to Yes (Fisher & Ury, of the Harvard Negotiation Project) argues for negotiating on the merits instead of haggling over positions: separate people from the problem, focus on underlying interests, invent options for mutual gain, and judge outcomes by objective criteria — with your BATNA as the source of real leverage. It’s an influential framework grounded in decision theory and negotiation experience rather than a lab-tested protocol.

Positional bargaining — staking a number and grinding toward the middle — wastes effort, strains relationships, and often leaves value on the table. Fisher and Ury’s alternative is to negotiate on the merits: get behind stated positions to the interests driving them, expand the options, and anchor agreement to standards both sides accept. Below are the core practices, each with the reasoning that makes it work.

The practices (6)

Why it works

A position is one solution a person has fixed on; the interest is the underlying need it was meant to satisfy. Positions clash because they’re single points, but interests are multiple and often compatible — so working at the interest level reveals overlaps that positional bargaining hides. Most interests can be met in more than one way.

How to do it
  1. 1For each demand, ask "why?" and "why not?" until you reach the underlying need.
  2. 2List your own interests and your best guess at theirs before you talk numbers.
  3. 3Acknowledge their interests as part of the problem, then look for solutions serving both.
Evidence
Mechanistic

A foundational tenet of the Harvard Negotiation Project. The interests-vs-positions distinction is widely taught and consistent with research on integrative bargaining, though the book itself is a framework, not an experiment.

Honest caveat: Mechanistically sound and widely adopted; treat it as a well-reasoned framework rather than a single quantified study.

Common mistake: Negotiating the two stated positions as if they’re the only options, so the talk becomes a tug-of-war with no room to create value.
Go deeper on this practice →

Practice this with IX Coach

Reading about a practice changes nothing on its own. IX Coach turns these into a guided, adaptive routine — discerning where you are in real time and walking the practice with you, session after session.

Start with IX Coach →

Related practices