JH
Jonathan Haber
Peterson & Seligman — VIA

How do you use your VIA character strengths to improve well-being and performance?

Using Peterson and Seligman’s 24 strengths to build flourishing from the inside out

Short answer

Peterson and Seligman’s VIA Classification identifies 24 character strengths organized under six virtues, and multiple randomized trials find that using your top "signature strengths" in new ways reliably increases well-being and decreases depressive symptoms. The effect is most robust when strengths are deployed in engaged, relational ways — not just recognized but actively applied.

In 2004, Christopher Peterson and Martin Seligman published the VIA Classification of Strengths — a systematic catalog of the moral and psychological virtues that appear across cultures and history. The practical insight is not just that knowing your strengths is validating, but that actively using them in new contexts is one of the best-tested routes to lasting well-being improvement. Here are the core practices, each with the mechanism behind it and an honest read on the evidence.

The practices (7)

Why it works

Self-assessment using a validated psychometric tool produces more accurate and stable strength identification than introspection alone, because people are often blind to their own signature strengths — they feel so natural that they seem unremarkable. Having a named, normed profile creates a cognitive anchor that supports deliberate strength deployment and builds a more accurate self-concept.

How to do it
  1. 1Take the free VIA Character Strengths Survey at viacharacter.org (takes 15–20 minutes).
  2. 2Read your top five results. For each, ask: "Does this feel like me? Do I feel energized when using it?"
  3. 3Energy and authenticity are better markers of a signature strength than position in the ranking.
  4. 4Identify your top three that pass this test — these are your signature strengths for the exercises below.
Evidence
Observational

The VIA survey has been validated across cultures and age groups, with reasonable psychometric properties. Signature strengths identified this way predict well-being outcomes in subsequent intervention studies.

Honest caveat: The survey is reliable for top strengths; lower-ranked strengths have less stability. Cross-cultural validity is established but some strength profiles vary by context.

  • — Peterson & Seligman (2004), Character Strengths and Virtues (APA/Oxford University Press)
  • — Park, Peterson & Seligman (2004), "Strengths of character and well-being," Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology
Common mistake: Taking the survey once and treating the results as fixed — character strengths are dispositional tendencies, not permanent traits, and usage context matters as much as ranking.
Go deeper on this practice →

Practice this with IX Coach

Reading about a practice changes nothing on its own. IX Coach turns these into a guided, adaptive routine — discerning where you are in real time and walking the practice with you, session after session.

Start with IX Coach →

Related practices