JH
Jonathan Haber

Anchor the conversation on criteria first

Set the standard the number should follow before any figure is named.

Key takeaways

  • What it is: Set the standard the number should follow before any figure is named.
  • Why it works: If you establish which criteria are fair before numbers appear, you anchor the framework rather than a single figure — and a framework you both agreed to is harder to dismiss than a raw number. The number then follows from the standard, giving your anchor principled cover.
  • Evidence: Plausible mechanism, limited direct outcome data.
  • Avoid: Jumping straight to a number, so the negotiation becomes a fight over figures with no agreed standard to anchor them.

Why it works

If you establish which criteria are fair before numbers appear, you anchor the framework rather than a single figure — and a framework you both agreed to is harder to dismiss than a raw number. The number then follows from the standard, giving your anchor principled cover.

How to do it

  1. 1Open by proposing the criteria that should govern the deal (market rate, cost-plus, precedent).
  2. 2Get agreement on the standard before anyone names a figure.
  3. 3Derive your anchor from the agreed standard so it inherits its legitimacy.

What the evidence says

Mechanistic

Combines anchoring research with the principled-negotiation idea of objective criteria; anchoring on a shared standard is a well-reasoned synthesis of both.

Honest caveat: This is a reasoned combination of anchoring and fairness research rather than a single tested effect.

Common mistake

Jumping straight to a number, so the negotiation becomes a fight over figures with no agreed standard to anchor them.

IX Coach helps you lead with the fair criteria before the figure, so your anchor lands as principle rather than a grab.

Practice this with IX Coach →

Related practices